Demographics details for Keizer, OR vs Tarkio, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keizer, OR vs Tarkio, MO.
Data | Keizer | Tarkio |
---|---|---|
Population | 38,704 | 1,477 |
Median Age | 35.8 years | 45.3 years |
Median Income | $75,753 | $56,875 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Keizer vs Tarkio
- In Keizer, the population is higher at 38,704, compared to 1,477 in Tarkio.
- The median age in Tarkio is higher at 45.3 years, compared to 35.8 years in Keizer.
- Keizer has a higher median income of $75,753 compared to $56,875 in Tarkio.
- In Tarkio, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 38.0% in Keizer.
- Keizer has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Tarkio.
- The unemployment rate in Keizer is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Tarkio.
Demographics
Demographics Keizer vs Tarkio provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Keizer | Tarkio |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 58 | 93 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 25 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keizer vs Tarkio
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Keizer at 1% compared to 0% in Tarkio.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tarkio at 93% compared to 58% in Keizer.
- The Asian population is larger in Keizer at 1% compared to 0% in Tarkio.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Keizer at 25% compared to 2% in Tarkio.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Keizer at 14% compared to 5% in Tarkio.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Keizer at 1% compared to 0% in Tarkio.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Keizer | Tarkio |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 12.2% |
Depression | 28.5% | 25.3% |
Smoking | 15.4% | 21.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 35.7% | 37.9% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keizer vs Tarkio
- More residents in Keizer report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.8% in Tarkio.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keizer at 28.5% compared to 25.3% in Tarkio.
- Tarkio has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 15.4% in Keizer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tarkio at 19.0% compared to 16.5% in Keizer.
- Tarkio has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 35.7% in Keizer.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tarkio at 23.0% compared to 16.0% in Keizer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Keizer | Tarkio |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (685) | 0.7% (11) |
High School Diploma | 12.7% (4,898) | 25.6% (378) |
Less than High School | 13.9% (5,363) | 16.3% (241) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (6,617) | 14.7% (217) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keizer vs Tarkio
- A higher percentage of residents in Keizer have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.7% in Tarkio.
- In Tarkio, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.6% compared to 12.7% in Keizer.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tarkio at 16.3%, compared to 13.9% in Keizer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keizer hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 14.7% in Tarkio.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.