Demographics details for Keizer, OR vs Soda springs, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keizer, OR vs Soda springs, CA.
| Data | Keizer | Soda springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 38,704 | 54 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 49.0 years |
| Median Income | $75,753 | $28,917 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | Data is updating |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Keizer vs Soda springs
- In Keizer, the population is higher at 38,704, compared to 54 in Soda springs.
- The median age in Soda springs is higher at 49.0 years, compared to 35.8 years in Keizer.
- Keizer has a higher median income of $75,753 compared to $28,917 in Soda springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Keizer at 38.0% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
- The poverty level is identical in both Keizer and Soda springs at 10%.
- Soda springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.6% in Keizer.
Demographics
Demographics Keizer vs Soda springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keizer | Soda springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 58 | 30 |
| Asian | 1 | 100 |
| Hispanic | 25 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 14 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keizer vs Soda springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Keizer at 1% compared to 0% in Soda springs.
- Keizer has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 30% in Soda springs.
- In Soda springs, the Asian population stands at 100%, greater than 1% in Keizer.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Keizer at 25% compared to 0% in Soda springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Keizer at 14% compared to 0% in Soda springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Keizer at 1% compared to 0% in Soda springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keizer | Soda springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 28.5% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 21.1% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 29.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keizer vs Soda springs
- More residents in Keizer report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.7% in Soda springs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keizer at 28.5% compared to 21.4% in Soda springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Keizer at 15.4% compared to 14.9% in Soda springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Soda springs at 21.1% compared to 16.5% in Keizer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Keizer at 35.7% compared to 29.7% in Soda springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keizer at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keizer | Soda springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (685) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (4,898) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (5,363) | 22.2% (12) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (6,617) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keizer vs Soda springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Keizer have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keizer hold a high school diploma at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Soda springs at 22.2%, compared to 13.9% in Keizer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keizer hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.