Demographics details for Keizer, OR vs Lexington, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keizer, OR vs Lexington, KY.
| Data | Keizer | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 38,704 | 320,347 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $75,753 | $66,087 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Keizer vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 320,347, compared to 38,704 in Keizer.
- Residents in Keizer have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 35.2 years in Lexington.
- Keizer has a higher median income of $75,753 compared to $66,087 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Keizer at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 10% in Keizer.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Keizer.
Demographics
Demographics Keizer vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keizer | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 15 |
| White | 58 | 68 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keizer vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 1% in Keizer.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lexington at 68% compared to 58% in Keizer.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Keizer.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Keizer at 25% compared to 7% in Lexington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Keizer at 14% compared to 6% in Lexington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Keizer at 1% compared to 0% in Lexington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keizer | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 28.5% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keizer vs Lexington
- More residents in Keizer report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.1% in Lexington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keizer at 28.5% compared to 24.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 15.4% in Keizer.
- Binge drinking is more common in Keizer at 16.5% compared to 15.9% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 35.7% in Keizer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keizer at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keizer | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (685) | 0.6% (2,032) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (4,898) | 9.9% (31,844) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (5,363) | 8.7% (27,787) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (6,617) | 30.4% (97,540) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keizer vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of residents in Keizer have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keizer hold a high school diploma at 12.7% compared to 9.9% in Lexington.
- More residents in Keizer have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 8.7% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 17.1% in Keizer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.