Demographics details for Keizer, OR vs Hope mills, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keizer, OR vs Hope mills, NC.
| Data | Keizer | Hope mills |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 38,704 | 17,824 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 32.5 years |
| Median Income | $75,753 | $57,864 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Keizer vs Hope mills
- In Keizer, the population is higher at 38,704, compared to 17,824 in Hope mills.
- Residents in Keizer have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 32.5 years in Hope mills.
- Keizer has a higher median income of $75,753 compared to $57,864 in Hope mills.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Keizer at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Hope mills.
- The poverty level is identical in both Keizer and Hope mills at 10%.
- Hope mills has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Keizer.
Demographics
Demographics Keizer vs Hope mills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keizer | Hope mills |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 34 |
| White | 58 | 35 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Keizer vs Hope mills
- In Hope mills, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 1% in Keizer.
- Keizer has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 35% in Hope mills.
- Both Keizer and Hope mills have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Keizer at 25% compared to 15% in Hope mills.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Keizer at 14% compared to 13% in Hope mills.
- In Hope mills, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Keizer.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keizer | Hope mills |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 28.5% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keizer vs Hope mills
- More residents in Keizer report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Hope mills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keizer at 28.5% compared to 25.9% in Hope mills.
- Hope mills has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 15.4% in Keizer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hope mills at 17.6% compared to 16.5% in Keizer.
- Hope mills has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 35.7% in Keizer.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Keizer and Hope mills at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keizer | Hope mills |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (685) | 0.4% (68) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (4,898) | 14.7% (2,614) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (5,363) | 6.9% (1,237) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (6,617) | 13.7% (2,437) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keizer vs Hope mills
- A higher percentage of residents in Keizer have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.4% in Hope mills.
- In Hope mills, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.7% compared to 12.7% in Keizer.
- More residents in Keizer have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 6.9% in Hope mills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keizer hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 13.7% in Hope mills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.