Demographics details for Keizer, OR vs Epsom, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keizer, OR vs Epsom, NH.
| Data | Keizer | Epsom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 38,704 | 4,756 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 41.0 years |
| Median Income | $75,753 | $71,000 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 65.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 1.9 |
Population Comparison: Keizer vs Epsom
- In Keizer, the population is higher at 38,704, compared to 4,756 in Epsom.
- The median age in Epsom is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 35.8 years in Keizer.
- Keizer has a higher median income of $75,753 compared to $71,000 in Epsom.
- In Epsom, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 38.0% in Keizer.
- Keizer has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Epsom.
- The unemployment rate in Keizer is higher at 3.6%, compared to 1.9% in Epsom.
Demographics
Demographics Keizer vs Epsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keizer | Epsom |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 58 | 98 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 25 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 14 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keizer vs Epsom
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Keizer and Epsom at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Epsom at 98% compared to 58% in Keizer.
- Both Keizer and Epsom have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Keizer at 25% compared to 0% in Epsom.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Keizer at 14% compared to 0% in Epsom.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Keizer at 1% compared to 0% in Epsom.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keizer | Epsom |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 28.5% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keizer vs Epsom
- More residents in Keizer report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keizer at 28.5% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Keizer at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Binge drinking is more common in Keizer at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Obesity rates are higher in Keizer at 35.7% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keizer at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keizer | Epsom |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (685) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (4,898) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (5,363) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (6,617) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keizer vs Epsom
- A higher percentage of residents in Keizer have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keizer hold a high school diploma at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- More residents in Keizer have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keizer hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.