Demographics details for Keiser, AR vs Southfield, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keiser, AR vs Southfield, MI.
| Data | Keiser | Southfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 713 | 75,431 |
| Median Age | 41.6 years | 42.1 years |
| Median Income | $50,136 | $63,980 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Keiser vs Southfield
- The population in Southfield is higher at 75,431, compared to 713 in Keiser.
- The median age in Southfield is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 41.6 years in Keiser.
- Southfield has a higher median income of $63,980, compared to $50,136 in Keiser.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Keiser at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Southfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Southfield at 13%, compared to 12% in Keiser.
- Southfield has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 3.5% in Keiser.
Demographics
Demographics Keiser vs Southfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keiser | Southfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 66 |
| White | 83 | 23 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keiser vs Southfield
- In Southfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 4% in Keiser.
- Keiser has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 23% in Southfield.
- In Southfield, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Keiser.
- Southfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Keiser.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Keiser at 12% compared to 7% in Southfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Keiser and Southfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keiser | Southfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 24.9% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keiser vs Southfield
- More residents in Keiser report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 15.4% in Southfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keiser at 28.9% compared to 17.6% in Southfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Keiser at 24.9% compared to 14.8% in Southfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Keiser at 15.2% compared to 14.9% in Southfield.
- Southfield has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 34.9% in Keiser.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keiser at 27.0% compared to 17.0% in Southfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keiser | Southfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 6.2% (44) | 1.2% (870) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (107) | 12.0% (9,038) |
| Less than High School | 55.5% (396) | 6.1% (4,623) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (52) | 27.5% (20,760) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keiser vs Southfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Keiser have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 1.2% in Southfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keiser hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Southfield.
- More residents in Keiser have less than a high school education at 55.5% compared to 6.1% in Southfield.
- In Southfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.5% compared to 7.3% in Keiser.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.