Demographics details for Keiser, AR vs Livingston, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keiser, AR vs Livingston, AL.
| Data | Keiser | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 713 | 3,205 |
| Median Age | 41.6 years | 21.2 years |
| Median Income | $50,136 | $20,417 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 27% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Keiser vs Livingston
- The population in Livingston is higher at 3,205, compared to 713 in Keiser.
- Residents in Keiser have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 21.2 years in Livingston.
- Keiser has a higher median income of $50,136 compared to $20,417 in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Keiser at 35.0% compared to 19.0% in Livingston.
- The poverty level is higher in Livingston at 27%, compared to 12% in Keiser.
- Livingston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Keiser.
Demographics
Demographics Keiser vs Livingston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keiser | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 58 |
| White | 83 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keiser vs Livingston
- In Livingston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 4% in Keiser.
- Keiser has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 38% in Livingston.
- In Livingston, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Keiser.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Keiser and Livingston at 1%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Keiser at 12% compared to 2% in Livingston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Keiser and Livingston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keiser | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 24.9% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 12.3% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 46.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keiser vs Livingston
- In Livingston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 20.3% in Keiser.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keiser at 28.9% compared to 22.0% in Livingston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Keiser at 24.9% compared to 21.5% in Livingston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Keiser at 15.2% compared to 12.3% in Livingston.
- Livingston has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 34.9% in Keiser.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keiser at 27.0% compared to 17.0% in Livingston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keiser | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 6.2% (44) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (107) | 7.7% (248) |
| Less than High School | 55.5% (396) | 2.3% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (52) | 15.5% (496) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keiser vs Livingston
- A higher percentage of residents in Keiser have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.0% in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keiser hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 7.7% in Livingston.
- More residents in Keiser have less than a high school education at 55.5% compared to 2.3% in Livingston.
- In Livingston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 7.3% in Keiser.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.