Demographics details for Keiser, AR vs Holly springs, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keiser, AR vs Holly springs, MS.
| Data | Keiser | Holly springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 713 | 6,823 |
| Median Age | 41.6 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $50,136 | $45,552 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Keiser vs Holly springs
- The population in Holly springs is higher at 6,823, compared to 713 in Keiser.
- Residents in Keiser have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 40.6 years in Holly springs.
- Keiser has a higher median income of $50,136 compared to $45,552 in Holly springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Keiser at 35.0% compared to 23.0% in Holly springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Holly springs at 20%, compared to 12% in Keiser.
- Holly springs has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.5% in Keiser.
Demographics
Demographics Keiser vs Holly springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keiser | Holly springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 79 |
| White | 83 | 17 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keiser vs Holly springs
- In Holly springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 79% compared to 4% in Keiser.
- Keiser has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 17% in Holly springs.
- Both Keiser and Holly springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Keiser at 1% compared to 0% in Holly springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Keiser at 12% compared to 4% in Holly springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Keiser and Holly springs at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keiser | Holly springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 24.9% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 11.9% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 48.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keiser vs Holly springs
- More residents in Keiser report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.9% in Holly springs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keiser at 28.9% compared to 19.8% in Holly springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Keiser at 24.9% compared to 24.1% in Holly springs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Keiser at 15.2% compared to 11.9% in Holly springs.
- Holly springs has higher obesity rates at 48.3% compared to 34.9% in Keiser.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keiser at 27.0% compared to 9.0% in Holly springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keiser | Holly springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 6.2% (44) | 0.7% (50) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (107) | 22.1% (1,509) |
| Less than High School | 55.5% (396) | 14.8% (1,007) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (52) | 8.9% (605) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keiser vs Holly springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Keiser have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.7% in Holly springs.
- In Holly springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 15.0% in Keiser.
- More residents in Keiser have less than a high school education at 55.5% compared to 14.8% in Holly springs.
- In Holly springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.9% compared to 7.3% in Keiser.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.