Demographics details for Keiser, AR vs Concord, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keiser, AR vs Concord, CA.
| Data | Keiser | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 713 | 122,625 |
| Median Age | 41.6 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $50,136 | $107,789 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Keiser vs Concord
- The population in Concord is higher at 122,625, compared to 713 in Keiser.
- Residents in Keiser have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 38.8 years in Concord.
- Concord has a higher median income of $107,789, compared to $50,136 in Keiser.
- In Concord, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 35.0% in Keiser.
- Keiser has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Concord.
- Concord has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.5% in Keiser.
Demographics
Demographics Keiser vs Concord provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keiser | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 4 |
| White | 83 | 33 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 14 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Keiser vs Concord
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Keiser and Concord at 4%.
- Keiser has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 33% in Concord.
- In Concord, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Keiser.
- Concord has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 1% in Keiser.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Concord at 16%, compared to 12% in Keiser.
- In Concord, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Keiser.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keiser | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 24.9% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 25.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keiser vs Concord
- More residents in Keiser report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 14.9% in Concord.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keiser at 28.9% compared to 17.8% in Concord.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Keiser at 24.9% compared to 10.7% in Concord.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Concord at 17.0% compared to 15.2% in Keiser.
- Obesity rates are higher in Keiser at 34.9% compared to 25.6% in Concord.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keiser at 27.0% compared to 12.0% in Concord.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keiser | Concord |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 6.2% (44) | 1.8% (2,147) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (107) | 13.0% (15,969) |
| Less than High School | 55.5% (396) | 15.7% (19,274) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (52) | 27.1% (33,174) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keiser vs Concord
- A higher percentage of residents in Keiser have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 1.8% in Concord.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keiser hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Concord.
- More residents in Keiser have less than a high school education at 55.5% compared to 15.7% in Concord.
- In Concord, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 7.3% in Keiser.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.