Demographics details for Keiser, AR vs Bossier city, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keiser, AR vs Bossier city, LA.
Data | Keiser | Bossier city |
---|---|---|
Population | 713 | 62,635 |
Median Age | 41.6 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $50,136 | $54,100 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Keiser vs Bossier city
- The population in Bossier city is higher at 62,635, compared to 713 in Keiser.
- Residents in Keiser have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 35.1 years in Bossier city.
- Bossier city has a higher median income of $54,100, compared to $50,136 in Keiser.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Keiser and Bossier city at 35.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Bossier city at 17%, compared to 12% in Keiser.
- Bossier city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Keiser.
Demographics
Demographics Keiser vs Bossier city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Keiser | Bossier city |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 28 |
White | 83 | 54 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keiser vs Bossier city
- In Bossier city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 4% in Keiser.
- Keiser has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 54% in Bossier city.
- In Bossier city, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Keiser.
- Bossier city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 1% in Keiser.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Keiser at 12% compared to 6% in Bossier city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Keiser and Bossier city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Keiser | Bossier city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.6% |
Depression | 28.9% | 25.0% |
Smoking | 24.9% | 21.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 38.8% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keiser vs Bossier city
- More residents in Keiser report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 19.4% in Bossier city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keiser at 28.9% compared to 25.0% in Bossier city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Keiser at 24.9% compared to 21.2% in Bossier city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bossier city at 16.9% compared to 15.2% in Keiser.
- Bossier city has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 34.9% in Keiser.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keiser at 27.0% compared to 14.0% in Bossier city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Keiser | Bossier city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 6.2% (44) | 0.6% (400) |
High School Diploma | 15.0% (107) | 17.8% (11,155) |
Less than High School | 55.5% (396) | 11.7% (7,331) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (52) | 16.1% (10,063) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keiser vs Bossier city
- A higher percentage of residents in Keiser have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.6% in Bossier city.
- In Bossier city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 15.0% in Keiser.
- More residents in Keiser have less than a high school education at 55.5% compared to 11.7% in Bossier city.
- In Bossier city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 7.3% in Keiser.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.