Demographics details for Keenesburg, CO vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Keenesburg, CO vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Keenesburg | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,080 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 29.5 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $86,827 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Keenesburg vs Fairburn
- The population in Fairburn is higher at 16,956, compared to 2,080 in Keenesburg.
- The median age in Fairburn is higher at 30.9 years, compared to 29.5 years in Keenesburg.
- Keenesburg has a higher median income of $86,827 compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Keenesburg at 30.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 8% in Keenesburg.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Keenesburg.
Demographics
Demographics Keenesburg vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Keenesburg | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 73 |
| White | 63 | 12 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 26 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Keenesburg vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 0% in Keenesburg.
- Keenesburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- Both Keenesburg and Fairburn have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Keenesburg at 26% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Keenesburg at 10% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Keenesburg at 1% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Keenesburg | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Keenesburg vs Fairburn
- More residents in Keenesburg report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Keenesburg at 23.0% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Keenesburg at 18.8% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Keenesburg at 17.7% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 30.2% in Keenesburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Keenesburg at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Keenesburg | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (2) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (307) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 6.4% (134) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.5% (135) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Keenesburg vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Keenesburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Keenesburg hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- More residents in Keenesburg have less than a high school education at 6.4% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- In Fairburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 6.5% in Keenesburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.