Demographics details for Kaysville, UT vs Stoughton, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kaysville, UT vs Stoughton, WI.
| Data | Kaysville | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,761 | 12,846 |
| Median Age | 32.1 years | 41.6 years |
| Median Income | $121,867 | $73,014 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kaysville vs Stoughton
- In Kaysville, the population is higher at 32,761, compared to 12,846 in Stoughton.
- The median age in Stoughton is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 32.1 years in Kaysville.
- Kaysville has a higher median income of $121,867 compared to $73,014 in Stoughton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kaysville at 45.0% compared to 40.0% in Stoughton.
- The poverty level is higher in Stoughton at 9%, compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- The unemployment rate in Kaysville is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Stoughton.
Demographics
Demographics Kaysville vs Stoughton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kaysville | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 88 | 93 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kaysville vs Stoughton
- In Stoughton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stoughton at 93% compared to 88% in Kaysville.
- The Asian population is larger in Kaysville at 1% compared to 0% in Stoughton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kaysville at 5% compared to 3% in Stoughton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kaysville at 6% compared to 3% in Stoughton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kaysville and Stoughton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kaysville | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 6.7% | 13.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.4% | 24.5% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 28.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kaysville vs Stoughton
- More residents in Kaysville report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 14.4% in Stoughton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stoughton at 24.8% versus 23.7% in Kaysville.
- Stoughton has a higher smoking rate at 13.8% compared to 6.7% in Kaysville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stoughton at 24.5% compared to 11.4% in Kaysville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kaysville at 31.6% compared to 28.8% in Stoughton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stoughton at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Kaysville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kaysville | Stoughton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (141) | 0.4% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 6.1% (1,986) | 14.4% (1,850) |
| Less than High School | 2.6% (859) | 7.6% (981) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.5% (9,340) | 25.2% (3,241) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kaysville vs Stoughton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Kaysville and Stoughton at 0.4%.
- In Stoughton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.4% compared to 6.1% in Kaysville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stoughton at 7.6%, compared to 2.6% in Kaysville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kaysville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 25.2% in Stoughton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.