Demographics details for Kaufman, TX vs Fort morgan, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kaufman, TX vs Fort morgan, CO.
Data | Kaufman | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
Population | 172,366 | 11,453 |
Median Age | 34.6 years | 32.8 years |
Median Income | $84,075 | $55,407 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Kaufman vs Fort morgan
- In Kaufman, the population is higher at 172,366, compared to 11,453 in Fort morgan.
- Residents in Kaufman have a higher median age of 34.6 years compared to 32.8 years in Fort morgan.
- Kaufman has a higher median income of $84,075 compared to $55,407 in Fort morgan.
- In Fort morgan, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 36.0% in Kaufman.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort morgan at 11%, compared to 10% in Kaufman.
- The unemployment rate in Kaufman is higher at 4.8%, compared to 2.5% in Fort morgan.
Demographics
Demographics Kaufman vs Fort morgan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kaufman | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
Black | 13 | 8 |
White | 53 | 16 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 22 | 49 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 23 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Kaufman vs Fort morgan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kaufman at 13% compared to 8% in Fort morgan.
- Kaufman has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 16% in Fort morgan.
- The Asian population is larger in Kaufman at 1% compared to 0% in Fort morgan.
- Fort morgan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 22% in Kaufman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort morgan at 23%, compared to 11% in Kaufman.
- In Fort morgan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Kaufman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kaufman | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 13.5% |
Depression | 22.6% | 21.7% |
Smoking | 16.1% | 18.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 36.6% | 29.3% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kaufman vs Fort morgan
- In Fort morgan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.8% in Kaufman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kaufman at 22.6% compared to 21.7% in Fort morgan.
- Fort morgan has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 16.1% in Kaufman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kaufman at 18.2% compared to 17.6% in Fort morgan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kaufman at 36.6% compared to 29.3% in Fort morgan.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Kaufman and Fort morgan at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kaufman | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (2,482) | 4.3% (496) |
High School Diploma | 12.9% (22,235) | 16.0% (1,831) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (24,496) | 25.8% (2,957) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (22,541) | 11.5% (1,312) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kaufman vs Fort morgan
- In Fort morgan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 1.4% in Kaufman.
- In Fort morgan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 12.9% in Kaufman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort morgan at 25.8%, compared to 14.2% in Kaufman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kaufman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 11.5% in Fort morgan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.