Demographics details for Kasson, MN vs Charleston, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kasson, MN vs Charleston, IL.
| Data | Kasson | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,996 | 17,119 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 29.4 years |
| Median Income | $91,581 | $47,533 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Kasson vs Charleston
- The population in Charleston is higher at 17,119, compared to 6,996 in Kasson.
- Residents in Kasson have a higher median age of 34.5 years compared to 29.4 years in Charleston.
- Kasson has a higher median income of $91,581 compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kasson at 47.0% compared to 32.0% in Charleston.
- The poverty level is higher in Charleston at 15%, compared to 7% in Kasson.
- Charleston has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.1% in Kasson.
Demographics
Demographics Kasson vs Charleston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kasson | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 8 |
| White | 94 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kasson vs Charleston
- In Charleston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Kasson.
- Kasson has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 83% in Charleston.
- In Charleston, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Kasson.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Kasson and Charleston at 4%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Charleston at 3%, compared to 2% in Kasson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kasson and Charleston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kasson | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kasson vs Charleston
- In Charleston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.1% in Kasson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Charleston at 24.2% versus 22.4% in Kasson.
- Charleston has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 15.8% in Kasson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kasson at 20.6% compared to 16.4% in Charleston.
- Charleston has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 35.8% in Kasson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Charleston at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Kasson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kasson | Charleston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (61) | 0.4% (68) |
| High School Diploma | 11.8% (829) | 13.6% (2,331) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (256) | 8.1% (1,387) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.1% (1,615) | 19.3% (3,307) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kasson vs Charleston
- A higher percentage of residents in Kasson have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- In Charleston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.6% compared to 11.8% in Kasson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Charleston at 8.1%, compared to 3.7% in Kasson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kasson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.1% compared to 19.3% in Charleston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.