Demographics details for Kansas, IL vs Norway, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kansas, IL vs Norway, IA.
| Data | Kansas | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 653 | 466 |
| Median Age | 44.3 years | 48.3 years |
| Median Income | $50,125 | $90,000 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Kansas vs Norway
- In Kansas, the population is higher at 653, compared to 466 in Norway.
- The median age in Norway is higher at 48.3 years, compared to 44.3 years in Kansas.
- Norway has a higher median income of $90,000, compared to $50,125 in Kansas.
- In Norway, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 42.0% in Kansas.
- Kansas has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The unemployment rate in Kansas is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.5% in Norway.
Demographics
Demographics Kansas vs Norway provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kansas | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 97 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kansas vs Norway
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kansas at 2% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norway at 100% compared to 97% in Kansas.
- Both Kansas and Norway have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Kansas and Norway at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kansas at 1% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kansas and Norway at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kansas | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 14.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 22.9% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kansas vs Norway
- More residents in Kansas report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 14.2% in Norway.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kansas at 22.3% compared to 17.5% in Norway.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kansas at 17.1% compared to 14.7% in Norway.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norway at 22.9% compared to 18.5% in Kansas.
- Norway has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 35.1% in Kansas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kansas at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Norway.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kansas | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (164) | 33.5% (156) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (82) | 5.6% (26) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (61) | 10.5% (49) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kansas vs Norway
- A higher percentage of residents in Kansas have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- In Norway, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.5% compared to 25.1% in Kansas.
- More residents in Kansas have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 5.6% in Norway.
- In Norway, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 9.3% in Kansas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.