Demographics details for Kansas city, MO vs Young harris, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kansas city, MO vs Young harris, GA.

Data Kansas city Young harris
Population 509,297 810
Median Age 35.4 years 20.4 years
Median Income $65,256 $27,500
Married Families 32.0% 19.0%
Poverty Level 15% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Kansas city vs Young harris

  • In Kansas city, the population is higher at 509,297, compared to 810 in Young harris.
  • Residents in Kansas city have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
  • Kansas city has a higher median income of $65,256 compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Kansas city at 32.0% compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
  • Kansas city has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Young harris.
  • The unemployment rate in Kansas city is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in Young harris.

Demographics

Demographics Kansas city vs Young harris provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kansas city Young harris
Black 26 14
White 53 70
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 11 11
Two or More Races 7 3
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Kansas city vs Young harris

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kansas city at 26% compared to 14% in Young harris.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Young harris at 70% compared to 53% in Kansas city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Kansas city at 3% compared to 0% in Young harris.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Kansas city and Young harris at 11%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Kansas city at 7% compared to 3% in Young harris.
  • In Young harris, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Kansas city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kansas city Young harris
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 12.0%
Depression 21.7% 23.4%
Smoking 18.7% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 18.2% 16.9%
Obesity 40.9% 33.5%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kansas city vs Young harris

  • More residents in Kansas city report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Young harris at 23.4% versus 21.7% in Kansas city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Kansas city at 18.7% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Kansas city at 18.2% compared to 16.9% in Young harris.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Kansas city at 40.9% compared to 33.5% in Young harris.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Young harris at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Kansas city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kansas city Young harris
No Schooling 1.0% (4,964) 0.2% (2)
High School Diploma 14.5% (73,825) 5.7% (46)
Less than High School 9.4% (47,724) 4.4% (36)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.1% (128,008) 9.3% (75)

Education Levels Comparison: Kansas city vs Young harris

  • A higher percentage of residents in Kansas city have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in Young harris.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Kansas city hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
  • More residents in Kansas city have less than a high school education at 9.4% compared to 4.4% in Young harris.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Kansas city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.1% compared to 9.3% in Young harris.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.