Environment details: Kansas city MO
moderate quality, local monitoring needed.
Environment details: Oakesdale WA
Good quality, few issues detected.
Compare Environment: Kansas city MO vs Oakesdale WA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Kansas city | Oakesdale |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 936 | 590 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | moderate quality, local monitoring needed. | Good quality, few issues detected. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.74 | 1.75 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 38 | 31 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Kansas city vs Oakesdale
- The water quality in Oakesdale is superior at 6/10 compared to 5/10 in Kansas city.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Oakesdale with an average index of 1.75 compared to 1.74 in Kansas city.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Kansas city at 38 compared to 31 in Oakesdale.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.