Demographics details for Kansas city, MO vs Norway, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kansas city, MO vs Norway, MI.
| Data | Kansas city | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 509,297 | 2,827 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 45.3 years |
| Median Income | $65,256 | $49,261 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Kansas city vs Norway
- In Kansas city, the population is higher at 509,297, compared to 2,827 in Norway.
- The median age in Norway is higher at 45.3 years, compared to 35.4 years in Kansas city.
- Kansas city has a higher median income of $65,256 compared to $49,261 in Norway.
- In Norway, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Kansas city.
- The poverty level is identical in both Kansas city and Norway at 15%.
- Norway has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.3% in Kansas city.
Demographics
Demographics Kansas city vs Norway provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kansas city | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | 1 |
| White | 53 | 96 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kansas city vs Norway
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kansas city at 26% compared to 1% in Norway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norway at 96% compared to 53% in Kansas city.
- The Asian population is larger in Kansas city at 3% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kansas city at 11% compared to 0% in Norway.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kansas city at 7% compared to 3% in Norway.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kansas city and Norway at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kansas city | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 40.9% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kansas city vs Norway
- More residents in Kansas city report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.9% in Norway.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Norway at 25.7% versus 21.7% in Kansas city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kansas city at 18.7% compared to 16.4% in Norway.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norway at 19.1% compared to 18.2% in Kansas city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kansas city at 40.9% compared to 34.9% in Norway.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Norway at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Kansas city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kansas city | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (4,964) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (73,825) | 21.9% (618) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (47,724) | 11.6% (329) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.1% (128,008) | 12.2% (346) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kansas city vs Norway
- A higher percentage of residents in Kansas city have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- In Norway, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 14.5% in Kansas city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Norway at 11.6%, compared to 9.4% in Kansas city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kansas city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.1% compared to 12.2% in Norway.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.