Demographics details for Kansas city, MO vs Lancaster, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kansas city, MO vs Lancaster, OH.
Data | Kansas city | Lancaster |
---|---|---|
Population | 509,297 | 41,174 |
Median Age | 35.4 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $65,256 | $52,716 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Kansas city vs Lancaster
- In Kansas city, the population is higher at 509,297, compared to 41,174 in Lancaster.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 35.4 years in Kansas city.
- Kansas city has a higher median income of $65,256 compared to $52,716 in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 32.0% in Kansas city.
- Kansas city has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.3% in Kansas city.
Demographics
Demographics Kansas city vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kansas city | Lancaster |
---|---|---|
Black | 26 | 1 |
White | 53 | 92 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 11 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kansas city vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kansas city at 26% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lancaster at 92% compared to 53% in Kansas city.
- The Asian population is larger in Kansas city at 3% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kansas city at 11% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kansas city at 7% compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kansas city and Lancaster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kansas city | Lancaster |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.6% |
Depression | 21.7% | 26.1% |
Smoking | 18.7% | 23.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 19.2% |
Obesity | 40.9% | 46.7% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kansas city vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.0% in Kansas city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 26.1% versus 21.7% in Kansas city.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 18.7% in Kansas city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lancaster at 19.2% compared to 18.2% in Kansas city.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 46.7% compared to 40.9% in Kansas city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Kansas city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kansas city | Lancaster |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (4,964) | 0.3% (125) |
High School Diploma | 14.5% (73,825) | 25.5% (10,487) |
Less than High School | 9.4% (47,724) | 10.7% (4,399) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.1% (128,008) | 13.9% (5,740) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kansas city vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of residents in Kansas city have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 14.5% in Kansas city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 10.7%, compared to 9.4% in Kansas city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kansas city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.1% compared to 13.9% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.