Demographics details for Kansas city, KS vs Green bay, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kansas city, KS vs Green bay, WI.

Data Kansas city Green bay
Population 153,345 106,095
Median Age 34.1 years 35.6 years
Median Income $56,120 $59,174
Married Families 33.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 14% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.4 3.2

Population Comparison: Kansas city vs Green bay

  • In Kansas city, the population is higher at 153,345, compared to 106,095 in Green bay.
  • The median age in Green bay is higher at 35.6 years, compared to 34.1 years in Kansas city.
  • Green bay has a higher median income of $59,174, compared to $56,120 in Kansas city.
  • In Green bay, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Kansas city.
  • Kansas city has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Green bay.
  • The unemployment rate in Kansas city is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.2% in Green bay.

Demographics

Demographics Kansas city vs Green bay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kansas city Green bay
Black 22 4
White 30 61
Asian 5 4
Hispanic 32 17
Two or More Races 10 11
American Indian 1 3

Demographics Comparison: Kansas city vs Green bay

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kansas city at 22% compared to 4% in Green bay.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Green bay at 61% compared to 30% in Kansas city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Kansas city at 5% compared to 4% in Green bay.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Kansas city at 32% compared to 17% in Green bay.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Green bay at 11%, compared to 10% in Kansas city.
  • In Green bay, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Kansas city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kansas city Green bay
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 11.0%
Depression 21.0% 22.1%
Smoking 23.9% 16.8%
Binge Drinking 17.2% 22.8%
Obesity 42.8% 38.0%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kansas city vs Green bay

  • More residents in Kansas city report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.3% in Green bay.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Green bay at 22.1% versus 21.0% in Kansas city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Kansas city at 23.9% compared to 16.8% in Green bay.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Green bay at 22.8% compared to 17.2% in Kansas city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Kansas city at 42.8% compared to 38.0% in Green bay.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Kansas city and Green bay at 14.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kansas city Green bay
No Schooling 2.5% (3,822) 1.7% (1,796)
High School Diploma 16.9% (25,923) 18.1% (19,183)
Less than High School 21.7% (33,318) 14.0% (14,805)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.7% (19,424) 16.6% (17,606)

Education Levels Comparison: Kansas city vs Green bay

  • A higher percentage of residents in Kansas city have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.7% in Green bay.
  • In Green bay, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 16.9% in Kansas city.
  • More residents in Kansas city have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 14.0% in Green bay.
  • In Green bay, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 12.7% in Kansas city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.