Demographics details for Kannapolis, NC vs Marathon, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kannapolis, NC vs Marathon, IA.
| Data | Kannapolis | Marathon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,448 | 223 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 46.5 years |
| Median Income | $66,487 | $38,750 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Kannapolis vs Marathon
- In Kannapolis, the population is higher at 55,448, compared to 223 in Marathon.
- The median age in Marathon is higher at 46.5 years, compared to 37.0 years in Kannapolis.
- Kannapolis has a higher median income of $66,487 compared to $38,750 in Marathon.
- In Marathon, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 35.0% in Kannapolis.
- The poverty level is identical in both Kannapolis and Marathon at 13%.
- The unemployment rate in Kannapolis is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.0% in Marathon.
Demographics
Demographics Kannapolis vs Marathon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kannapolis | Marathon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | Data is updating |
| White | 57 | 86 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kannapolis vs Marathon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kannapolis at 22% compared to 0% in Marathon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Marathon at 86% compared to 57% in Kannapolis.
- The Asian population is larger in Kannapolis at 2% compared to 0% in Marathon.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kannapolis at 12% compared to 6% in Marathon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marathon at 8%, compared to 7% in Kannapolis.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kannapolis and Marathon at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kannapolis | Marathon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 16.0% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 21.5% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 33.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kannapolis vs Marathon
- More residents in Kannapolis report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.5% in Marathon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kannapolis at 24.6% compared to 16.0% in Marathon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kannapolis at 18.9% compared to 17.3% in Marathon.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Marathon at 21.5% compared to 16.7% in Kannapolis.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kannapolis at 36.6% compared to 33.9% in Marathon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Marathon at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Kannapolis.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kannapolis | Marathon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (548) | 1.3% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (8,714) | 23.8% (53) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (7,881) | 13.9% (31) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (9,747) | 9.0% (20) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kannapolis vs Marathon
- In Marathon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.0% in Kannapolis.
- In Marathon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 15.7% in Kannapolis.
- More residents in Kannapolis have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 13.9% in Marathon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kannapolis hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 9.0% in Marathon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.