Demographics details for Kannapolis, NC vs Grandview, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kannapolis, NC vs Grandview, MO.
Data | Kannapolis | Grandview |
---|---|---|
Population | 55,448 | 25,610 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $66,487 | $51,048 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Kannapolis vs Grandview
- In Kannapolis, the population is higher at 55,448, compared to 25,610 in Grandview.
- Residents in Kannapolis have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 35.9 years in Grandview.
- Kannapolis has a higher median income of $66,487 compared to $51,048 in Grandview.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kannapolis at 35.0% compared to 30.0% in Grandview.
- Kannapolis has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Grandview.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Kannapolis and Grandview at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Kannapolis vs Grandview provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kannapolis | Grandview |
---|---|---|
Black | 22 | 34 |
White | 57 | 40 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 12 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kannapolis vs Grandview
- In Grandview, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 22% in Kannapolis.
- Kannapolis has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 40% in Grandview.
- Both Kannapolis and Grandview have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Grandview has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 12% in Kannapolis.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grandview at 8%, compared to 7% in Kannapolis.
- In Grandview, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Kannapolis.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kannapolis | Grandview |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.1% |
Depression | 24.6% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 18.9% | 20.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 36.6% | 41.9% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kannapolis vs Grandview
- In Grandview, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.9% in Kannapolis.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kannapolis at 24.6% compared to 21.6% in Grandview.
- Grandview has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 18.9% in Kannapolis.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grandview at 18.1% compared to 16.7% in Kannapolis.
- Grandview has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 36.6% in Kannapolis.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grandview at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Kannapolis.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kannapolis | Grandview |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (548) | 0.8% (200) |
High School Diploma | 15.7% (8,714) | 19.0% (4,878) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (7,881) | 10.6% (2,721) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (9,747) | 16.2% (4,147) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kannapolis vs Grandview
- A higher percentage of residents in Kannapolis have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Grandview.
- In Grandview, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 15.7% in Kannapolis.
- More residents in Kannapolis have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 10.6% in Grandview.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kannapolis hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 16.2% in Grandview.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.