Demographics details for Kannapolis, NC vs Clermont, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kannapolis, NC vs Clermont, FL.
| Data | Kannapolis | Clermont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,448 | 46,506 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $66,487 | $75,951 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Kannapolis vs Clermont
- In Kannapolis, the population is higher at 55,448, compared to 46,506 in Clermont.
- The median age in Clermont is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 37.0 years in Kannapolis.
- Clermont has a higher median income of $75,951, compared to $66,487 in Kannapolis.
- In Clermont, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 35.0% in Kannapolis.
- Kannapolis has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Clermont.
- The unemployment rate in Kannapolis is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.7% in Clermont.
Demographics
Demographics Kannapolis vs Clermont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kannapolis | Clermont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 14 |
| White | 57 | 45 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kannapolis vs Clermont
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kannapolis at 22% compared to 14% in Clermont.
- Kannapolis has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 45% in Clermont.
- In Clermont, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Kannapolis.
- Clermont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 12% in Kannapolis.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clermont at 16%, compared to 7% in Kannapolis.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kannapolis and Clermont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kannapolis | Clermont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kannapolis vs Clermont
- More residents in Kannapolis report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.7% in Clermont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kannapolis at 24.6% compared to 19.5% in Clermont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kannapolis at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Clermont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kannapolis at 16.7% compared to 15.5% in Clermont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kannapolis at 36.6% compared to 34.9% in Clermont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kannapolis at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Clermont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kannapolis | Clermont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (548) | 0.4% (195) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (8,714) | 12.5% (5,809) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (7,881) | 5.7% (2,631) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (9,747) | 21.9% (10,177) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kannapolis vs Clermont
- A higher percentage of residents in Kannapolis have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Clermont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kannapolis hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 12.5% in Clermont.
- More residents in Kannapolis have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 5.7% in Clermont.
- In Clermont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 17.6% in Kannapolis.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.