Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs Woodbridge, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs Woodbridge, VA.
| Data | Jurupa valley | Woodbridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,609 | 42,619 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 34.2 years |
| Median Income | $91,562 | $93,347 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Woodbridge
- In Jurupa valley, the population is higher at 107,609, compared to 42,619 in Woodbridge.
- The median age in Woodbridge is higher at 34.2 years, compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Woodbridge has a higher median income of $93,347, compared to $91,562 in Jurupa valley.
- In Woodbridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Woodbridge.
- The unemployment rate in Jurupa valley is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.2% in Woodbridge.
Demographics
Demographics Jurupa valley vs Woodbridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jurupa valley | Woodbridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 26 |
| White | 8 | 10 |
| Asian | 4 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 71 | 41 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Woodbridge
- In Woodbridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 26% compared to 3% in Jurupa valley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodbridge at 10% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- In Woodbridge, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 4% in Jurupa valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 41% in Woodbridge.
- Both Jurupa valley and Woodbridge have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 13%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jurupa valley and Woodbridge at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jurupa valley | Woodbridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 13.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 34.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Woodbridge
- More residents in Jurupa valley report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 13.3% in Woodbridge.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 17.4%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jurupa valley at 14.6% compared to 10.7% in Woodbridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodbridge at 16.3% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jurupa valley at 38.4% compared to 34.0% in Woodbridge.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Jurupa valley and Woodbridge at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jurupa valley | Woodbridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (3,376) | 3.4% (1,450) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (18,582) | 15.8% (6,727) |
| Less than High School | 34.3% (36,892) | 17.5% (7,473) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (9,706) | 20.2% (8,628) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Woodbridge
- In Woodbridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 3.1% in Jurupa valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 15.8% in Woodbridge.
- More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 17.5% in Woodbridge.
- In Woodbridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.