Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs West columbia, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs West columbia, SC.

Data Jurupa valley West columbia
Population 107,609 17,618
Median Age 33.5 years 37.3 years
Median Income $91,562 $52,648
Married Families 34.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 12% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.9 3.7

Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs West columbia

  • In Jurupa valley, the population is higher at 107,609, compared to 17,618 in West columbia.
  • The median age in West columbia is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562 compared to $52,648 in West columbia.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Jurupa valley at 34.0% compared to 32.0% in West columbia.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in West columbia.
  • The unemployment rate in Jurupa valley is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.7% in West columbia.

Demographics

Demographics Jurupa valley vs West columbia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Jurupa valley West columbia
Black 3 18
White 8 59
Asian 4 3
Hispanic 71 11
Two or More Races 13 9
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs West columbia

  • In West columbia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 3% in Jurupa valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in West columbia at 59% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Jurupa valley at 4% compared to 3% in West columbia.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 11% in West columbia.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Jurupa valley at 13% compared to 9% in West columbia.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jurupa valley at 1% compared to 0% in West columbia.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Jurupa valley West columbia
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 18.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 12.6%
Depression 17.4% 23.3%
Smoking 14.6% 19.0%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 16.6%
Obesity 38.4% 40.2%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs West columbia

  • In West columbia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in West columbia at 23.3% versus 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
  • West columbia has a higher smoking rate at 19.0% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in West columbia at 16.6% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
  • West columbia has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 38.4% in Jurupa valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in West columbia at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Jurupa valley West columbia
No Schooling 3.1% (3,376) 0.4% (77)
High School Diploma 17.3% (18,582) 16.4% (2,891)
Less than High School 34.3% (36,892) 12.4% (2,185)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.0% (9,706) 26.1% (4,593)

Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs West columbia

  • A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.4% in West columbia.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 16.4% in West columbia.
  • More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 12.4% in West columbia.
  • In West columbia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.