Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs Springdale, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs Springdale, AR.

Data Jurupa valley Springdale
Population 107,609 87,672
Median Age 33.5 years 32.1 years
Median Income $91,562 $59,985
Married Families 34.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.9 2.7

Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Springdale

  • In Jurupa valley, the population is higher at 107,609, compared to 87,672 in Springdale.
  • Residents in Jurupa valley have a higher median age of 33.5 years compared to 32.1 years in Springdale.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562 compared to $59,985 in Springdale.
  • In Springdale, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Jurupa valley.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Springdale.
  • The unemployment rate in Jurupa valley is higher at 4.9%, compared to 2.7% in Springdale.

Demographics

Demographics Jurupa valley vs Springdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Jurupa valley Springdale
Black 3 3
White 8 36
Asian 4 3
Hispanic 71 38
Two or More Races 13 19
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Springdale

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Jurupa valley and Springdale at 3%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Springdale at 36% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Jurupa valley at 4% compared to 3% in Springdale.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 38% in Springdale.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springdale at 19%, compared to 13% in Jurupa valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jurupa valley and Springdale at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Jurupa valley Springdale
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 14.4%
Depression 17.4% 25.2%
Smoking 14.6% 20.4%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 14.2%
Obesity 38.4% 35.5%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Springdale

  • In Springdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Springdale at 25.2% versus 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
  • Springdale has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Jurupa valley at 16.1% compared to 14.2% in Springdale.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Jurupa valley at 38.4% compared to 35.5% in Springdale.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springdale at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Jurupa valley Springdale
No Schooling 3.1% (3,376) 2.6% (2,317)
High School Diploma 17.3% (18,582) 14.5% (12,683)
Less than High School 34.3% (36,892) 26.6% (23,284)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.0% (9,706) 14.0% (12,306)

Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Springdale

  • A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 2.6% in Springdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 14.5% in Springdale.
  • More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 26.6% in Springdale.
  • In Springdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.