Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs Livingston, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs Livingston, TX.
Data | Jurupa valley | Livingston |
---|---|---|
Population | 107,609 | 5,784 |
Median Age | 33.5 years | 36.9 years |
Median Income | $91,562 | $47,952 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Livingston
- In Jurupa valley, the population is higher at 107,609, compared to 5,784 in Livingston.
- The median age in Livingston is higher at 36.9 years, compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562 compared to $47,952 in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jurupa valley at 34.0% compared to 28.0% in Livingston.
- The poverty level is identical in both Jurupa valley and Livingston at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Jurupa valley is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.5% in Livingston.
Demographics
Demographics Jurupa valley vs Livingston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jurupa valley | Livingston |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 18 |
White | 8 | 38 |
Asian | 4 | 2 |
Hispanic | 71 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 13 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Livingston
- In Livingston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 3% in Jurupa valley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Livingston at 38% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Jurupa valley at 4% compared to 2% in Livingston.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 29% in Livingston.
- Both Jurupa valley and Livingston have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 13%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jurupa valley at 1% compared to 0% in Livingston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jurupa valley | Livingston |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.1% |
Depression | 17.4% | 24.1% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 19.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 38.4% | 42.1% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Livingston
- In Livingston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Livingston at 24.1% versus 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Livingston has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Livingston at 17.9% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
- Livingston has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 38.4% in Jurupa valley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Livingston at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jurupa valley | Livingston |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.1% (3,376) | 2.1% (123) |
High School Diploma | 17.3% (18,582) | 20.7% (1,198) |
Less than High School | 34.3% (36,892) | 22.3% (1,289) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (9,706) | 9.0% (518) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Livingston
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 2.1% in Livingston.
- In Livingston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.7% compared to 17.3% in Jurupa valley.
- More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 22.3% in Livingston.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Jurupa valley and Livingston at 9.0%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.