Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs Kendleton, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs Kendleton, TX.
Data | Jurupa valley | Kendleton |
---|---|---|
Population | 107,609 | 348 |
Median Age | 33.5 years | 51.4 years |
Median Income | $91,562 | $42,679 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 18.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Kendleton
- In Jurupa valley, the population is higher at 107,609, compared to 348 in Kendleton.
- The median age in Kendleton is higher at 51.4 years, compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562 compared to $42,679 in Kendleton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jurupa valley at 34.0% compared to 18.0% in Kendleton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Jurupa valley and Kendleton at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Jurupa valley is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.5% in Kendleton.
Demographics
Demographics Jurupa valley vs Kendleton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jurupa valley | Kendleton |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 45 |
White | 8 | 26 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 71 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Kendleton
- In Kendleton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 3% in Jurupa valley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kendleton at 26% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Jurupa valley at 4% compared to 0% in Kendleton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 23% in Kendleton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jurupa valley at 13% compared to 6% in Kendleton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jurupa valley at 1% compared to 0% in Kendleton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jurupa valley | Kendleton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 20.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 15.2% |
Depression | 17.4% | 19.8% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 23.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 12.9% |
Obesity | 38.4% | 45.9% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Kendleton
- In Kendleton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kendleton at 19.8% versus 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Kendleton has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jurupa valley at 16.1% compared to 12.9% in Kendleton.
- Kendleton has higher obesity rates at 45.9% compared to 38.4% in Jurupa valley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kendleton at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jurupa valley | Kendleton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.1% (3,376) | 7.2% (25) |
High School Diploma | 17.3% (18,582) | 41.4% (144) |
Less than High School | 34.3% (36,892) | 16.4% (57) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (9,706) | 1.7% (6) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Kendleton
- In Kendleton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 7.2% compared to 3.1% in Jurupa valley.
- In Kendleton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 41.4% compared to 17.3% in Jurupa valley.
- More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 16.4% in Kendleton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.0% compared to 1.7% in Kendleton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.