Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs Hartford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs Hartford, CT.
| Data | Jurupa valley | Hartford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,609 | 120,686 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $91,562 | $41,841 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Hartford
- The population in Hartford is higher at 120,686, compared to 107,609 in Jurupa valley.
- Residents in Jurupa valley have a higher median age of 33.5 years compared to 33.1 years in Hartford.
- Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562 compared to $41,841 in Hartford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jurupa valley at 34.0% compared to 19.0% in Hartford.
- The poverty level is higher in Hartford at 20%, compared to 12% in Jurupa valley.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Jurupa valley and Hartford at 4.9%.
Demographics
Demographics Jurupa valley vs Hartford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jurupa valley | Hartford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 36 |
| White | 8 | 2 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 71 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Hartford
- In Hartford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 36% compared to 3% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 8% compared to 2% in Hartford.
- The Asian population is larger in Jurupa valley at 4% compared to 2% in Hartford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 46% in Hartford.
- Both Jurupa valley and Hartford have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 13%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jurupa valley and Hartford at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jurupa valley | Hartford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 12.1% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Hartford
- In Hartford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hartford at 22.6% versus 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Hartford has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jurupa valley at 16.1% compared to 12.1% in Hartford.
- Hartford has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 38.4% in Jurupa valley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hartford at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jurupa valley | Hartford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (3,376) | 2.9% (3,500) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (18,582) | 17.4% (21,002) |
| Less than High School | 34.3% (36,892) | 27.9% (33,618) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (9,706) | 11.0% (13,316) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Hartford
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 2.9% in Hartford.
- In Hartford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.4% compared to 17.3% in Jurupa valley.
- More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 27.9% in Hartford.
- In Hartford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.