Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs Hancock, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs Hancock, NH.
| Data | Jurupa valley | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,609 | 1,654 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 50.0 years |
| Median Income | $91,562 | $85,000 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Hancock
- In Jurupa valley, the population is higher at 107,609, compared to 1,654 in Hancock.
- The median age in Hancock is higher at 50.0 years, compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562 compared to $85,000 in Hancock.
- In Hancock, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 34.0% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Hancock.
- The unemployment rate in Jurupa valley is higher at 4.9%, compared to 2.5% in Hancock.
Demographics
Demographics Jurupa valley vs Hancock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jurupa valley | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 8 | 95 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 71 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Hancock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jurupa valley at 3% compared to 0% in Hancock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hancock at 95% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Jurupa valley at 4% compared to 2% in Hancock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 0% in Hancock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jurupa valley at 13% compared to 3% in Hancock.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jurupa valley at 1% compared to 0% in Hancock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jurupa valley | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 17.4% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Hancock
- More residents in Jurupa valley report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jurupa valley at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jurupa valley at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jurupa valley at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jurupa valley at 38.4% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jurupa valley at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jurupa valley | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (3,376) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (18,582) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 34.3% (36,892) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (9,706) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Hancock
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Hancock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.