Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs Firth, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs Firth, NE.
| Data | Jurupa valley | Firth |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,609 | 654 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $91,562 | $86,042 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Firth
- In Jurupa valley, the population is higher at 107,609, compared to 654 in Firth.
- The median age in Firth is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562 compared to $86,042 in Firth.
- In Firth, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Firth.
- The unemployment rate in Jurupa valley is higher at 4.9%, compared to 2.5% in Firth.
Demographics
Demographics Jurupa valley vs Firth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jurupa valley | Firth |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 8 | 85 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 71 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Firth
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jurupa valley at 3% compared to 0% in Firth.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Firth at 85% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Jurupa valley at 4% compared to 1% in Firth.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 8% in Firth.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jurupa valley at 13% compared to 6% in Firth.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jurupa valley at 1% compared to 0% in Firth.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jurupa valley | Firth |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 12.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 7.0% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 11.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 24.1% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Firth
- More residents in Jurupa valley report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 12.3% in Firth.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Firth at 17.9% versus 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jurupa valley at 14.6% compared to 11.4% in Firth.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Firth at 24.1% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jurupa valley at 38.4% compared to 31.5% in Firth.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jurupa valley at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in Firth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jurupa valley | Firth |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (3,376) | 3.2% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (18,582) | 9.2% (60) |
| Less than High School | 34.3% (36,892) | 10.1% (66) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (9,706) | 12.5% (82) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Firth
- In Firth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 3.1% in Jurupa valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 9.2% in Firth.
- More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 10.1% in Firth.
- In Firth, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.