Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs Denver, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs Denver, CO.
Data | Jurupa valley | Denver |
---|---|---|
Population | 107,609 | 713,252 |
Median Age | 33.5 years | 34.9 years |
Median Income | $91,562 | $85,853 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Denver
- The population in Denver is higher at 713,252, compared to 107,609 in Jurupa valley.
- The median age in Denver is higher at 34.9 years, compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562 compared to $85,853 in Denver.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jurupa valley at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in Denver.
- The poverty level is higher in Denver at 14%, compared to 12% in Jurupa valley.
- The unemployment rate in Jurupa valley is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.2% in Denver.
Demographics
Demographics Jurupa valley vs Denver provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jurupa valley | Denver |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 9 |
White | 8 | 44 |
Asian | 4 | 4 |
Hispanic | 71 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 13 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Denver
- In Denver, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Jurupa valley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Denver at 44% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- Both Jurupa valley and Denver have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 29% in Denver.
- Both Jurupa valley and Denver have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 13%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jurupa valley and Denver at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jurupa valley | Denver |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 14.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 9.5% |
Depression | 17.4% | 21.2% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 12.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 21.0% |
Obesity | 38.4% | 22.0% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Denver
- More residents in Jurupa valley report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.7% in Denver.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Denver at 21.2% versus 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jurupa valley at 14.6% compared to 12.6% in Denver.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Denver at 21.0% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jurupa valley at 38.4% compared to 22.0% in Denver.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Denver at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jurupa valley | Denver |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.1% (3,376) | 1.1% (8,015) |
High School Diploma | 17.3% (18,582) | 8.8% (62,842) |
Less than High School | 34.3% (36,892) | 12.6% (90,120) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (9,706) | 39.5% (281,784) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Denver
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.1% in Denver.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 8.8% in Denver.
- More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 12.6% in Denver.
- In Denver, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.