Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs Cross plains, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs Cross plains, TX.

Data Jurupa valley Cross plains
Population 107,609 926
Median Age 33.5 years 28.3 years
Median Income $91,562 $48,516
Married Families 34.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 12% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.9 4.2

Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Cross plains

  • In Jurupa valley, the population is higher at 107,609, compared to 926 in Cross plains.
  • Residents in Jurupa valley have a higher median age of 33.5 years compared to 28.3 years in Cross plains.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562 compared to $48,516 in Cross plains.
  • In Cross plains, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 34.0% in Jurupa valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cross plains at 13%, compared to 12% in Jurupa valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Jurupa valley is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.2% in Cross plains.

Demographics

Demographics Jurupa valley vs Cross plains provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Jurupa valley Cross plains
Black 3 Data is updating
White 8 90
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 71 6
Two or More Races 13 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Cross plains

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jurupa valley at 3% compared to 0% in Cross plains.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cross plains at 90% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Jurupa valley at 4% compared to 0% in Cross plains.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 6% in Cross plains.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Jurupa valley at 13% compared to 4% in Cross plains.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jurupa valley at 1% compared to 0% in Cross plains.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Jurupa valley Cross plains
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 11.8%
Depression 17.4% 25.7%
Smoking 14.6% 18.1%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 19.6%
Obesity 38.4% 36.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 32.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Cross plains

  • In Cross plains, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cross plains at 25.7% versus 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
  • Cross plains has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cross plains at 19.6% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Jurupa valley at 38.4% compared to 36.1% in Cross plains.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cross plains at 32.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Jurupa valley Cross plains
No Schooling 3.1% (3,376) 0.1% (1)
High School Diploma 17.3% (18,582) 19.3% (179)
Less than High School 34.3% (36,892) 6.0% (56)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.0% (9,706) 9.2% (85)

Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Cross plains

  • A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.1% in Cross plains.
  • In Cross plains, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 17.3% in Jurupa valley.
  • More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 6.0% in Cross plains.
  • In Cross plains, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.