Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs Colquitt, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs Colquitt, GA.
| Data | Jurupa valley | Colquitt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,609 | 45,762 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $91,562 | $47,235 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Colquitt
- In Jurupa valley, the population is higher at 107,609, compared to 45,762 in Colquitt.
- The median age in Colquitt is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562 compared to $47,235 in Colquitt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jurupa valley at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in Colquitt.
- The poverty level is higher in Colquitt at 22%, compared to 12% in Jurupa valley.
- The unemployment rate in Jurupa valley is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.7% in Colquitt.
Demographics
Demographics Jurupa valley vs Colquitt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jurupa valley | Colquitt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 23 |
| White | 8 | 51 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 71 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Colquitt
- In Colquitt, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 3% in Jurupa valley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Colquitt at 51% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Jurupa valley at 4% compared to 1% in Colquitt.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 20% in Colquitt.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jurupa valley at 13% compared to 4% in Colquitt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jurupa valley and Colquitt at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jurupa valley | Colquitt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 22.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Colquitt
- In Colquitt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Colquitt at 22.4% versus 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Colquitt has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jurupa valley at 16.1% compared to 13.7% in Colquitt.
- Colquitt has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 38.4% in Jurupa valley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Colquitt at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jurupa valley | Colquitt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (3,376) | 1.5% (678) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (18,582) | 20.2% (9,244) |
| Less than High School | 34.3% (36,892) | 26.2% (12,009) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (9,706) | 9.6% (4,394) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Colquitt
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.5% in Colquitt.
- In Colquitt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 17.3% in Jurupa valley.
- More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 26.2% in Colquitt.
- In Colquitt, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.6% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.