Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs Canby, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs Canby, OR.
| Data | Jurupa valley | Canby |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107,609 | 18,074 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $91,562 | $91,823 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Canby
- In Jurupa valley, the population is higher at 107,609, compared to 18,074 in Canby.
- The median age in Canby is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Canby has a higher median income of $91,823, compared to $91,562 in Jurupa valley.
- In Canby, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 34.0% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Canby.
- The unemployment rate in Jurupa valley is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.9% in Canby.
Demographics
Demographics Jurupa valley vs Canby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jurupa valley | Canby |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 8 | 69 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 71 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Canby
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jurupa valley at 3% compared to 1% in Canby.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Canby at 69% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Jurupa valley at 4% compared to 2% in Canby.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 18% in Canby.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jurupa valley at 13% compared to 9% in Canby.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jurupa valley and Canby at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jurupa valley | Canby |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 33.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Canby
- In Canby, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Canby at 26.5% versus 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jurupa valley at 14.6% compared to 14.4% in Canby.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Canby at 18.6% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jurupa valley at 38.4% compared to 33.8% in Canby.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Canby at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jurupa valley | Canby |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (3,376) | 1.4% (248) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (18,582) | 15.5% (2,794) |
| Less than High School | 34.3% (36,892) | 13.7% (2,480) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (9,706) | 20.1% (3,636) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Canby
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.4% in Canby.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 15.5% in Canby.
- More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 13.7% in Canby.
- In Canby, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.1% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.