Demographics details for Jurupa valley, CA vs Adamsburg, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Jurupa valley, CA vs Adamsburg, PA.

Data Jurupa valley Adamsburg
Population 107,609 143
Median Age 33.5 years 27.6 years
Median Income $91,562 $71,429
Married Families 34.0% 22.0%
Poverty Level 12% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.9 3.1

Population Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Adamsburg

  • In Jurupa valley, the population is higher at 107,609, compared to 143 in Adamsburg.
  • Residents in Jurupa valley have a higher median age of 33.5 years compared to 27.6 years in Adamsburg.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562 compared to $71,429 in Adamsburg.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Jurupa valley at 34.0% compared to 22.0% in Adamsburg.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Adamsburg.
  • The unemployment rate in Jurupa valley is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.1% in Adamsburg.

Demographics

Demographics Jurupa valley vs Adamsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Jurupa valley Adamsburg
Black 3 Data is updating
White 8 92
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 71 Data is updating
Two or More Races 13 7
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Adamsburg

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jurupa valley at 3% compared to 0% in Adamsburg.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Adamsburg at 92% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Jurupa valley at 4% compared to 0% in Adamsburg.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Jurupa valley at 71% compared to 0% in Adamsburg.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Jurupa valley at 13% compared to 7% in Adamsburg.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jurupa valley and Adamsburg at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Jurupa valley Adamsburg
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 12.5%
Depression 17.4% 22.6%
Smoking 14.6% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 19.3%
Obesity 38.4% 34.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Adamsburg

  • In Adamsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Adamsburg at 22.6% versus 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
  • Adamsburg has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Adamsburg at 19.3% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Jurupa valley at 38.4% compared to 34.1% in Adamsburg.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Adamsburg at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Jurupa valley Adamsburg
No Schooling 3.1% (3,376) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 17.3% (18,582) 19.6% (28)
Less than High School 34.3% (36,892) 2.8% (4)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.0% (9,706) 7.0% (10)

Education Levels Comparison: Jurupa valley vs Adamsburg

  • A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.0% in Adamsburg.
  • In Adamsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 17.3% in Jurupa valley.
  • More residents in Jurupa valley have less than a high school education at 34.3% compared to 2.8% in Adamsburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jurupa valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Adamsburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.