Environment details: Jupiter FL
Good quality; efficient management at work.
Environment details: Maple valley WA
Average quality, acceptable.
Compare Environment: Jupiter FL vs Maple valley WA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Jupiter | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 1811 | 590 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Good quality; efficient management at work. | Average quality, acceptable. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.76 | 1.54 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 54 | 21 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Jupiter vs Maple valley
- Water quality is rated higher in Jupiter at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in Maple valley.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Jupiter at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Maple valley.
- The average air quality index is worse in Jupiter with 1.76 compared to 1.54 in Maple valley.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Jupiter at 54 compared to 21 in Maple valley.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.