Demographics details for Jupiter, FL vs Gooding, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jupiter, FL vs Gooding, ID.
| Data | Jupiter | Gooding |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,126 | 15,715 |
| Median Age | 47.1 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $105,413 | $60,938 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Jupiter vs Gooding
- In Jupiter, the population is higher at 61,126, compared to 15,715 in Gooding.
- Residents in Jupiter have a higher median age of 47.1 years compared to 38.3 years in Gooding.
- Jupiter has a higher median income of $105,413 compared to $60,938 in Gooding.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jupiter at 45.0% compared to 40.0% in Gooding.
- Jupiter has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Gooding.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Jupiter and Gooding at 2.9%.
Demographics
Demographics Jupiter vs Gooding provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jupiter | Gooding |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 69 | 60 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Jupiter vs Gooding
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jupiter at 1% compared to 0% in Gooding.
- Jupiter has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 60% in Gooding.
- The Asian population is larger in Jupiter at 2% compared to 0% in Gooding.
- Gooding has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 16% in Jupiter.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jupiter at 11% compared to 9% in Gooding.
- In Gooding, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Jupiter.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jupiter | Gooding |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 12.8% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 22.7% |
| Smoking | 14.4% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 23.3% | 36.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jupiter vs Gooding
- In Gooding, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 14.1% in Jupiter.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gooding at 22.7% versus 17.9% in Jupiter.
- Gooding has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 14.4% in Jupiter.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jupiter at 17.7% compared to 15.6% in Gooding.
- Gooding has higher obesity rates at 36.9% compared to 23.3% in Jupiter.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gooding at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Jupiter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jupiter | Gooding |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 0.8% (131) |
| High School Diploma | 10.8% (6,624) | 19.5% (3,066) |
| Less than High School | 9.1% (5,552) | 26.7% (4,203) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.5% (22,312) | 10.1% (1,588) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jupiter vs Gooding
- A higher percentage of residents in Jupiter have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Gooding.
- In Gooding, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.5% compared to 10.8% in Jupiter.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gooding at 26.7%, compared to 9.1% in Jupiter.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jupiter hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.5% compared to 10.1% in Gooding.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.