Demographics details for Jupiter, FL vs Edmonds, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jupiter, FL vs Edmonds, WA.
| Data | Jupiter | Edmonds |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,126 | 42,593 |
| Median Age | 47.1 years | 45.8 years |
| Median Income | $105,413 | $110,057 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Jupiter vs Edmonds
- In Jupiter, the population is higher at 61,126, compared to 42,593 in Edmonds.
- Residents in Jupiter have a higher median age of 47.1 years compared to 45.8 years in Edmonds.
- Edmonds has a higher median income of $110,057, compared to $105,413 in Jupiter.
- In Edmonds, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 45.0% in Jupiter.
- Jupiter has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Edmonds.
- Edmonds has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 2.9% in Jupiter.
Demographics
Demographics Jupiter vs Edmonds provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jupiter | Edmonds |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 69 | 75 |
| Asian | 2 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jupiter vs Edmonds
- In Edmonds, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Jupiter.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Edmonds at 75% compared to 69% in Jupiter.
- In Edmonds, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Jupiter.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jupiter at 16% compared to 6% in Edmonds.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jupiter at 11% compared to 8% in Edmonds.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jupiter at 1% compared to 0% in Edmonds.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jupiter | Edmonds |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 28.1% |
| Smoking | 14.4% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 23.3% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jupiter vs Edmonds
- In Edmonds, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 14.1% in Jupiter.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Edmonds at 28.1% versus 17.9% in Jupiter.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jupiter at 14.4% compared to 9.6% in Edmonds.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jupiter at 17.7% compared to 16.4% in Edmonds.
- Edmonds has higher obesity rates at 31.0% compared to 23.3% in Jupiter.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Edmonds at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Jupiter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jupiter | Edmonds |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 0.5% (232) |
| High School Diploma | 10.8% (6,624) | 11.0% (4,689) |
| Less than High School | 9.1% (5,552) | 4.1% (1,747) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.5% (22,312) | 38.7% (16,493) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jupiter vs Edmonds
- A higher percentage of residents in Jupiter have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Edmonds.
- In Edmonds, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.0% compared to 10.8% in Jupiter.
- More residents in Jupiter have less than a high school education at 9.1% compared to 4.1% in Edmonds.
- In Edmonds, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.7% compared to 36.5% in Jupiter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.