Demographics details for Jupiter, FL vs Big sandy, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jupiter, FL vs Big sandy, TX.
| Data | Jupiter | Big sandy |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,126 | 1,286 |
| Median Age | 47.1 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $105,413 | $41,250 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Jupiter vs Big sandy
- In Jupiter, the population is higher at 61,126, compared to 1,286 in Big sandy.
- Residents in Jupiter have a higher median age of 47.1 years compared to 36.0 years in Big sandy.
- Jupiter has a higher median income of $105,413 compared to $41,250 in Big sandy.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jupiter at 45.0% compared to 36.0% in Big sandy.
- The poverty level is higher in Big sandy at 13%, compared to 9% in Jupiter.
- Big sandy has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.9% in Jupiter.
Demographics
Demographics Jupiter vs Big sandy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jupiter | Big sandy |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 14 |
| White | 69 | 69 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jupiter vs Big sandy
- In Big sandy, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 1% in Jupiter.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Jupiter and Big sandy at 69%.
- The Asian population is larger in Jupiter at 2% compared to 0% in Big sandy.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jupiter at 16% compared to 12% in Big sandy.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jupiter at 11% compared to 5% in Big sandy.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jupiter at 1% compared to 0% in Big sandy.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jupiter | Big sandy |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 14.4% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 23.3% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jupiter vs Big sandy
- In Big sandy, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.1% in Jupiter.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Big sandy at 25.4% versus 17.9% in Jupiter.
- Big sandy has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 14.4% in Jupiter.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Big sandy at 17.9% compared to 17.7% in Jupiter.
- Big sandy has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 23.3% in Jupiter.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Big sandy at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Jupiter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jupiter | Big sandy |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 0.6% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 10.8% (6,624) | 13.8% (178) |
| Less than High School | 9.1% (5,552) | 23.4% (301) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.5% (22,312) | 11.0% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jupiter vs Big sandy
- A higher percentage of residents in Jupiter have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Big sandy.
- In Big sandy, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 10.8% in Jupiter.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Big sandy at 23.4%, compared to 9.1% in Jupiter.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jupiter hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.5% compared to 11.0% in Big sandy.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.