Demographics details for Junction, TX vs Ephrata, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Junction, TX vs Ephrata, WA.
| Data | Junction | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,519 | 8,476 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $55,110 | $57,958 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Junction vs Ephrata
- The population in Ephrata is higher at 8,476, compared to 2,519 in Junction.
- Residents in Junction have a higher median age of 35.0 years compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher median income of $57,958, compared to $55,110 in Junction.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Junction at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- Junction has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Junction.
Demographics
Demographics Junction vs Ephrata provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Junction | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 36 | 63 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 41 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Junction vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Junction at 3% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ephrata at 63% compared to 36% in Junction.
- Both Junction and Ephrata have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Junction at 41% compared to 25% in Ephrata.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Junction at 20% compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Junction and Ephrata at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Junction | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Junction vs Ephrata
- More residents in Junction report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.0% in Ephrata.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ephrata at 27.0% versus 25.7% in Junction.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Junction at 21.8% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in Junction.
- Obesity rates are higher in Junction at 39.9% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- Disability percentages are higher in Junction at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Junction | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (53) | 0.8% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (369) | 17.7% (1,503) |
| Less than High School | 24.4% (615) | 14.4% (1,223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (327) | 8.0% (677) |
Education Levels Comparison: Junction vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of residents in Junction have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- In Ephrata, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 14.6% in Junction.
- More residents in Junction have less than a high school education at 24.4% compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of residents in Junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.