Demographics details for Junction city, KY vs Waipahu, HI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Junction city, KY vs Waipahu, HI.

Data Junction city Waipahu
Population 2,290 39,873
Median Age 41.6 years 39.6 years
Median Income $38,646 $87,961
Married Families 35.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.6

Population Comparison: Junction city vs Waipahu

  • The population in Waipahu is higher at 39,873, compared to 2,290 in Junction city.
  • Residents in Junction city have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 39.6 years in Waipahu.
  • Waipahu has a higher median income of $87,961, compared to $38,646 in Junction city.
  • In Waipahu, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Waipahu.
  • Waipahu has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.0% in Junction city.

Demographics

Demographics Junction city vs Waipahu provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Junction city Waipahu
Black 2 1
White 79 11
Asian Data is updating 67
Hispanic 7 6
Two or More Races 12 15
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Junction city vs Waipahu

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Junction city at 2% compared to 1% in Waipahu.
  • Junction city has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 11% in Waipahu.
  • In Waipahu, the Asian population stands at 67%, greater than 0% in Junction city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Junction city at 7% compared to 6% in Waipahu.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waipahu at 15%, compared to 12% in Junction city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Junction city and Waipahu at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Junction city Waipahu
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 12.7%
Physical Health Not Good 14.8% 8.3%
Depression 29.5% 10.2%
Smoking 23.5% 12.9%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 14.8%
Obesity 41.2% 22.4%
Disability Percentage 27.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Junction city vs Waipahu

  • More residents in Junction city report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 12.7% in Waipahu.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Junction city at 29.5% compared to 10.2% in Waipahu.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Junction city at 23.5% compared to 12.9% in Waipahu.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Junction city at 15.1% compared to 14.8% in Waipahu.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Junction city at 41.2% compared to 22.4% in Waipahu.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Junction city at 27.0% compared to 14.0% in Waipahu.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Junction city Waipahu
No Schooling 1.6% (37) 1.8% (729)
High School Diploma 23.9% (547) 22.1% (8,831)
Less than High School 18.0% (412) 11.0% (4,392)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.2% (211) 13.0% (5,195)

Education Levels Comparison: Junction city vs Waipahu

  • In Waipahu, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.6% in Junction city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Junction city hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 22.1% in Waipahu.
  • More residents in Junction city have less than a high school education at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Waipahu.
  • In Waipahu, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 9.2% in Junction city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.