Demographics details for Junction city, KY vs Marshall, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Junction city, KY vs Marshall, AR.

Data Junction city Marshall
Population 2,290 1,339
Median Age 41.6 years 52.3 years
Median Income $38,646 $28,290
Married Families 35.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 15% 16%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.2

Population Comparison: Junction city vs Marshall

  • In Junction city, the population is higher at 2,290, compared to 1,339 in Marshall.
  • The median age in Marshall is higher at 52.3 years, compared to 41.6 years in Junction city.
  • Junction city has a higher median income of $38,646 compared to $28,290 in Marshall.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Junction city at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Marshall.
  • The poverty level is higher in Marshall at 16%, compared to 15% in Junction city.
  • Marshall has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Junction city.

Demographics

Demographics Junction city vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Junction city Marshall
Black 2 Data is updating
White 79 84
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 7 3
Two or More Races 12 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Junction city vs Marshall

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Junction city at 2% compared to 0% in Marshall.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Marshall at 84% compared to 79% in Junction city.
  • Both Junction city and Marshall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Junction city at 7% compared to 3% in Marshall.
  • Both Junction city and Marshall have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 12%.
  • In Marshall, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Junction city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Junction city Marshall
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 21.7%
Physical Health Not Good 14.8% 16.2%
Depression 29.5% 29.8%
Smoking 23.5% 27.2%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 14.7%
Obesity 41.2% 39.2%
Disability Percentage 27.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Junction city vs Marshall

  • In Marshall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 20.0% in Junction city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Marshall at 29.8% versus 29.5% in Junction city.
  • Marshall has a higher smoking rate at 27.2% compared to 23.5% in Junction city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Junction city at 15.1% compared to 14.7% in Marshall.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Junction city at 41.2% compared to 39.2% in Marshall.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Marshall at 30.0% compared to 27.0% in Junction city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Junction city Marshall
No Schooling 1.6% (37) 0.9% (12)
High School Diploma 23.9% (547) 27.9% (373)
Less than High School 18.0% (412) 32.4% (434)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.2% (211) 11.7% (156)

Education Levels Comparison: Junction city vs Marshall

  • A higher percentage of residents in Junction city have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.9% in Marshall.
  • In Marshall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 23.9% in Junction city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Marshall at 32.4%, compared to 18.0% in Junction city.
  • In Marshall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 9.2% in Junction city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.