Demographics details for Junction city, KY vs Jessup, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Junction city, KY vs Jessup, PA.
Data | Junction city | Jessup |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,290 | 4,488 |
Median Age | 41.6 years | 44.9 years |
Median Income | $38,646 | $58,869 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Junction city vs Jessup
- The population in Jessup is higher at 4,488, compared to 2,290 in Junction city.
- The median age in Jessup is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 41.6 years in Junction city.
- Jessup has a higher median income of $58,869, compared to $38,646 in Junction city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Junction city at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Jessup.
- Junction city has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Jessup.
- Jessup has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 4.0% in Junction city.
Demographics
Demographics Junction city vs Jessup provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Junction city | Jessup |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 79 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 7 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Junction city vs Jessup
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Junction city at 2% compared to 1% in Jessup.
- Junction city has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 76% in Jessup.
- In Jessup, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Junction city.
- Jessup has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 7% in Junction city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jessup at 13%, compared to 12% in Junction city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Junction city and Jessup at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Junction city | Jessup |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 10.4% |
Depression | 29.5% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 23.5% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 18.6% |
Obesity | 41.2% | 31.1% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Junction city vs Jessup
- More residents in Junction city report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.2% in Jessup.
- Depression is more prevalent in Junction city at 29.5% compared to 23.0% in Jessup.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Junction city at 23.5% compared to 16.8% in Jessup.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jessup at 18.6% compared to 15.1% in Junction city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Junction city at 41.2% compared to 31.1% in Jessup.
- Disability percentages are higher in Junction city at 27.0% compared to 19.0% in Jessup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Junction city | Jessup |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (37) | 0.7% (31) |
High School Diploma | 23.9% (547) | 27.2% (1,221) |
Less than High School | 18.0% (412) | 11.1% (498) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (211) | 19.0% (852) |
Education Levels Comparison: Junction city vs Jessup
- A higher percentage of residents in Junction city have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.7% in Jessup.
- In Jessup, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.2% compared to 23.9% in Junction city.
- More residents in Junction city have less than a high school education at 18.0% compared to 11.1% in Jessup.
- In Jessup, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.0% compared to 9.2% in Junction city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.