Demographics details for Junction city, KY vs Erskine, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Junction city, KY vs Erskine, MN.

Data Junction city Erskine
Population 2,290 393
Median Age 41.6 years 39.5 years
Median Income $38,646 $26,000
Married Families 35.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 15% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.2

Population Comparison: Junction city vs Erskine

  • In Junction city, the population is higher at 2,290, compared to 393 in Erskine.
  • Residents in Junction city have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 39.5 years in Erskine.
  • Junction city has a higher median income of $38,646 compared to $26,000 in Erskine.
  • In Erskine, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 35.0% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Erskine.
  • Erskine has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Junction city.

Demographics

Demographics Junction city vs Erskine provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Junction city Erskine
Black 2 Data is updating
White 79 80
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 7 10
Two or More Races 12 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Junction city vs Erskine

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Junction city at 2% compared to 0% in Erskine.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Erskine at 80% compared to 79% in Junction city.
  • In Erskine, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Junction city.
  • Erskine has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 7% in Junction city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Junction city at 12% compared to 7% in Erskine.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Junction city and Erskine at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Junction city Erskine
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good 14.8% 10.0%
Depression 29.5% 24.3%
Smoking 23.5% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 21.9%
Obesity 41.2% 39.8%
Disability Percentage 27.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Junction city vs Erskine

  • More residents in Junction city report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.6% in Erskine.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Junction city at 29.5% compared to 24.3% in Erskine.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Junction city at 23.5% compared to 19.9% in Erskine.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Erskine at 21.9% compared to 15.1% in Junction city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Junction city at 41.2% compared to 39.8% in Erskine.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Junction city at 27.0% compared to 20.0% in Erskine.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Junction city Erskine
No Schooling 1.6% (37) 1.3% (5)
High School Diploma 23.9% (547) 33.8% (133)
Less than High School 18.0% (412) 18.3% (72)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.2% (211) 4.3% (17)

Education Levels Comparison: Junction city vs Erskine

  • A higher percentage of residents in Junction city have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.3% in Erskine.
  • In Erskine, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.8% compared to 23.9% in Junction city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Erskine at 18.3%, compared to 18.0% in Junction city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Junction city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 4.3% in Erskine.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.