Demographics details for Junction city, KS vs Hospers, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Junction city, KS vs Hospers, IA.

Data Junction city Hospers
Population 22,264 710
Median Age 28.5 years 29.8 years
Median Income $60,709 $69,659
Married Families 40.0% 57.0%
Poverty Level 13% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 3.2

Population Comparison: Junction city vs Hospers

  • In Junction city, the population is higher at 22,264, compared to 710 in Hospers.
  • The median age in Hospers is higher at 29.8 years, compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
  • Hospers has a higher median income of $69,659, compared to $60,709 in Junction city.
  • In Hospers, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 40.0% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in Hospers.
  • The unemployment rate in Junction city is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.2% in Hospers.

Demographics

Demographics Junction city vs Hospers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Junction city Hospers
Black 20 Data is updating
White 43 70
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 18 26
Two or More Races 15 3
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Junction city vs Hospers

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Junction city at 20% compared to 0% in Hospers.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Hospers at 70% compared to 43% in Junction city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Junction city at 3% compared to 0% in Hospers.
  • Hospers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 18% in Junction city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Junction city at 15% compared to 3% in Hospers.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Junction city and Hospers at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Junction city Hospers
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% 9.0%
Depression 19.2% 16.6%
Smoking 18.5% 15.2%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 21.6%
Obesity 41.8% 38.1%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Junction city vs Hospers

  • More residents in Junction city report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.2% in Hospers.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Junction city at 19.2% compared to 16.6% in Hospers.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Junction city at 18.5% compared to 15.2% in Hospers.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Hospers at 21.6% compared to 16.6% in Junction city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Junction city at 41.8% compared to 38.1% in Hospers.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Junction city at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Hospers.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Junction city Hospers
No Schooling 1.0% (216) 0.3% (2)
High School Diploma 12.4% (2,755) 26.6% (189)
Less than High School 6.9% (1,535) 14.4% (102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.2% (2,941) 11.3% (80)

Education Levels Comparison: Junction city vs Hospers

  • A higher percentage of residents in Junction city have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Hospers.
  • In Hospers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.6% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hospers at 14.4%, compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Junction city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 11.3% in Hospers.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.