Demographics details for Junction city, KS vs Goliad, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Junction city, KS vs Goliad, TX.
Data | Junction city | Goliad |
---|---|---|
Population | 22,264 | 7,131 |
Median Age | 28.5 years | 44.7 years |
Median Income | $60,709 | $58,125 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Junction city vs Goliad
- In Junction city, the population is higher at 22,264, compared to 7,131 in Goliad.
- The median age in Goliad is higher at 44.7 years, compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
- Junction city has a higher median income of $60,709 compared to $58,125 in Goliad.
- In Goliad, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 40.0% in Junction city.
- Junction city has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Goliad.
- The unemployment rate in Junction city is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.5% in Goliad.
Demographics
Demographics Junction city vs Goliad provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Junction city | Goliad |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | 5 |
White | 43 | 46 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 18 | 36 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 13 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Junction city vs Goliad
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Junction city at 20% compared to 5% in Goliad.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Goliad at 46% compared to 43% in Junction city.
- The Asian population is larger in Junction city at 3% compared to 0% in Goliad.
- Goliad has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 18% in Junction city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Junction city at 15% compared to 13% in Goliad.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Junction city at 1% compared to 0% in Goliad.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Junction city | Goliad |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Depression | 19.2% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 41.8% | 37.9% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Junction city vs Goliad
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Junction city and Goliad at 17.1%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Goliad at 22.9% versus 19.2% in Junction city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Junction city at 18.5% compared to 16.4% in Goliad.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Goliad at 18.5% compared to 16.6% in Junction city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Junction city at 41.8% compared to 37.9% in Goliad.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Goliad at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Junction city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Junction city | Goliad |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (216) | 0.6% (44) |
High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,755) | 18.7% (1,337) |
Less than High School | 6.9% (1,535) | 21.3% (1,516) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (2,941) | 12.6% (900) |
Education Levels Comparison: Junction city vs Goliad
- A higher percentage of residents in Junction city have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Goliad.
- In Goliad, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Goliad at 21.3%, compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Junction city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 12.6% in Goliad.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.