Demographics details for Junction city, KS vs Concord, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Junction city, KS vs Concord, CA.
Data | Junction city | Concord |
---|---|---|
Population | 22,264 | 122,625 |
Median Age | 28.5 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $60,709 | $107,789 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Junction city vs Concord
- The population in Concord is higher at 122,625, compared to 22,264 in Junction city.
- The median age in Concord is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
- Concord has a higher median income of $107,789, compared to $60,709 in Junction city.
- In Concord, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 40.0% in Junction city.
- Junction city has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Concord.
- The unemployment rate in Junction city is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.4% in Concord.
Demographics
Demographics Junction city vs Concord provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Junction city | Concord |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | 4 |
White | 43 | 33 |
Asian | 3 | 14 |
Hispanic | 18 | 32 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 16 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Junction city vs Concord
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Junction city at 20% compared to 4% in Concord.
- Junction city has a higher percentage of White residents at 43% compared to 33% in Concord.
- In Concord, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 3% in Junction city.
- Concord has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 18% in Junction city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Concord at 16%, compared to 15% in Junction city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Junction city and Concord at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Junction city | Concord |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Depression | 19.2% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 10.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 41.8% | 25.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Junction city vs Concord
- More residents in Junction city report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.9% in Concord.
- Depression is more prevalent in Junction city at 19.2% compared to 17.8% in Concord.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Junction city at 18.5% compared to 10.7% in Concord.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Concord at 17.0% compared to 16.6% in Junction city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Junction city at 41.8% compared to 25.6% in Concord.
- Disability percentages are higher in Junction city at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Concord.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Junction city | Concord |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (216) | 1.8% (2,147) |
High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,755) | 13.0% (15,969) |
Less than High School | 6.9% (1,535) | 15.7% (19,274) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (2,941) | 27.1% (33,174) |
Education Levels Comparison: Junction city vs Concord
- In Concord, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.0% in Junction city.
- In Concord, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.0% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Concord at 15.7%, compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
- In Concord, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 13.2% in Junction city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.