Demographics details for Junction city, KS vs Ashland, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Junction city, KS vs Ashland, OH.
| Data | Junction city | Ashland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,264 | 19,015 |
| Median Age | 28.5 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $60,709 | $56,040 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Junction city vs Ashland
- In Junction city, the population is higher at 22,264, compared to 19,015 in Ashland.
- The median age in Ashland is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
- Junction city has a higher median income of $60,709 compared to $56,040 in Ashland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Junction city at 40.0% compared to 38.0% in Ashland.
- Junction city has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Ashland.
- The unemployment rate in Junction city is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.2% in Ashland.
Demographics
Demographics Junction city vs Ashland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Junction city | Ashland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 2 |
| White | 43 | 91 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Junction city vs Ashland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Junction city at 20% compared to 2% in Ashland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ashland at 91% compared to 43% in Junction city.
- The Asian population is larger in Junction city at 3% compared to 1% in Ashland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Junction city at 18% compared to 2% in Ashland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Junction city at 15% compared to 4% in Ashland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Junction city at 1% compared to 0% in Ashland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Junction city | Ashland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Junction city vs Ashland
- In Ashland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 17.1% in Junction city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ashland at 24.6% versus 19.2% in Junction city.
- Ashland has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 18.5% in Junction city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ashland at 18.1% compared to 16.6% in Junction city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Junction city at 41.8% compared to 38.7% in Ashland.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Junction city and Ashland at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Junction city | Ashland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (216) | 0.1% (28) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,755) | 23.0% (4,380) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (1,535) | 12.3% (2,337) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (2,941) | 16.6% (3,160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Junction city vs Ashland
- A higher percentage of residents in Junction city have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.1% in Ashland.
- In Ashland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ashland at 12.3%, compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
- In Ashland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 13.2% in Junction city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.