Demographics details for Jonesboro, AR vs Fishing creek, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Jonesboro, AR vs Fishing creek, MD.

Data Jonesboro Fishing creek
Population 79,876 235
Median Age 33.8 years 55.9 years
Median Income $51,124 $76,250
Married Families 34.0% 58.0%
Poverty Level 16% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.5

Population Comparison: Jonesboro vs Fishing creek

  • In Jonesboro, the population is higher at 79,876, compared to 235 in Fishing creek.
  • The median age in Fishing creek is higher at 55.9 years, compared to 33.8 years in Jonesboro.
  • Fishing creek has a higher median income of $76,250, compared to $51,124 in Jonesboro.
  • In Fishing creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 34.0% in Jonesboro.
  • Jonesboro has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • Fishing creek has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Jonesboro.

Demographics

Demographics Jonesboro vs Fishing creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Jonesboro Fishing creek
Black 21 Data is updating
White 66 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Jonesboro vs Fishing creek

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jonesboro at 21% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fishing creek at 100% compared to 66% in Jonesboro.
  • The Asian population is larger in Jonesboro at 2% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Jonesboro at 7% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Jonesboro at 4% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jonesboro and Fishing creek at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Jonesboro Fishing creek
Mental Health Not Good 18.8% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.0% 9.6%
Depression 26.9% 21.2%
Smoking 19.8% 15.1%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 16.8%
Obesity 42.8% 33.1%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 28.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Jonesboro vs Fishing creek

  • More residents in Jonesboro report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 15.3% in Fishing creek.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Jonesboro at 26.9% compared to 21.2% in Fishing creek.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Jonesboro at 19.8% compared to 15.1% in Fishing creek.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fishing creek at 16.8% compared to 13.9% in Jonesboro.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Jonesboro at 42.8% compared to 33.1% in Fishing creek.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fishing creek at 28.0% compared to 18.0% in Jonesboro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Jonesboro Fishing creek
No Schooling 0.8% (607) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.3% (12,183) 34.5% (81)
Less than High School 9.5% (7,582) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.8% (15,034) 16.2% (38)

Education Levels Comparison: Jonesboro vs Fishing creek

  • A higher percentage of residents in Jonesboro have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • In Fishing creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.5% compared to 15.3% in Jonesboro.
  • More residents in Jonesboro have less than a high school education at 9.5% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jonesboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 16.2% in Fishing creek.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.